Jump to content

Not Guilty. Disgusting!!!


White Fox
 Share

Recommended Posts

Big criminals can afford good lawyers and the verdict is contradictory and makes the legal system look stupid.

 

veryone knows what they do whatever the verdict is. They are sick hypocrites and cannot deny euthanasia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like many outcomes in our legal system, it is a compromise verdict. The jury did not want to find peta zealots guilty of cruelty to animals, so they were found guilty of 'littering'. The judge was not fooled though. The sentence he handed down, and the confiscation of the van, are much tougher penalties than would be given to one who threw a soda can onto a highway.

 

FLinFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throwing exterminated animal carcasses away is classed as littering?

Sick legal system.

Mind; at least it came to court in the US.

In the UK the RSPCA make PETA look like amateurs. 100 000 killed a year.

I WILL SAY THAT AGAIN: THE RSPCA DISHES OUT DEATH TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND ANIMALS A YEAR given to them to rehome or rscued by caring folk.

These are their figures. If you are british tell EVERYONE not to support them.

Write to them and ask them for the figurs of the animals they destroy evry year; mostly healthy; many wild.

They are planning a huge advertising campaign against fur so that to me is a declaration of war. Let's give 'em hell boys n girls.

 

Write to you MP and get their Royal decree removed, and ask for them to stop the needless and utterly pointless slaughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...