Guest Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 It may be obvious to some that there came a point in human history that fur became more than something functional. I believe I may have stumbled on that point in human history. To explain further I am going to have to explain something that may not be palatable to those of you of a religious disposition. It may shock some of you to realise for example that a couple of million years ago here were dozens of human like creatures. Different species entirely to us with a common ancestor. Most of them hunted, wore fur and had fire. Made tents from hides; etc. It may surprise you also that 70 000 years ago almost all these humans ceased to exist; including man. This is called a bottleneck, and only three species of homanids survived it as far as we know (though Bigfoot; yeti etc may reveal more). These were ourselves, Neanderthal and Hobbit (Homo floresiensis) which was the size of a three year old human. The latter probably survived as late as 13 000 years ago and its dna may yet be found in remote tribes. They were not human. However they had culture; complex weaponry and tools etc. as did neanderthal. In fact. there is also emerging evidence of neanderthal and humna interbreeding, though no dna evidence has been found in modern humans. Sexually transmitted disease is in the frame. The important point to us is HOW these three "human" species survived, and what is the significant factor that enabled their survival through the devastation caused by the nuclear winter of 70 000 years ago; that killed the vast majority of homanids and humans. Only 1000 humans survived this 'holocaust', and they had to have survived for a reason. It has emerged recently, shocking the archeological/anthropological world, that there was a human setlement in Russia, sophisticated to the point of trade, using SNARES to catch artic fox/hares etc , 46 000 years ago. The most significant find was that of sophisticated bone NEEDLES. Not so far away and also recently discovered is a settlement 28 000 years old. By this time the society is clearly hierarchical (supposedly impossible) and marked by use of animals as a sign of wealth...furs and teeth. What is making archeaologists scratch their heads is WHAT man was doing out of Africa for the second time, in the coldest driest place on earth....well BEFORE he was living in caves again in Europe. Well I shouldn't have to tell youse lot should I? Such interpretation of history is largely the fault of Judaeo Christian and socialist thinking in our culture today, which has analysed human cultures that predate our own with a perspective born of that . So for example, man ALWAYS got the blame for overhunting mammoth because he was bound to be a greedy selfish savage because he predated the benign teachings of Moses/Christ. For two hundred years, and without ANY evidence at all, history has taught this complete and utter lie. NOW we know different: the mammoth along with many other animals (including man in the Americas) became extinct due to a rapid global waming that makes our problems miniscule. When you think polar bears may have less than 20 years left on the planet you get the picture. Socialism and capitalism too have perpetuated such tainted views, as has what we have valued in the last 20 years or so. To the extent that Historians have been unable to accept until now, and still can't work it out, what the hell man was doing in sub arctic Russia with a society which appears to have some kind of "royalty" . The clues are there for all to see: the first human culture known to possess complex language, trade, and hierarchy. The most advanced humans ever to have existed, completely unexpectedly, and their culture is based on FUR. THAT is not considered notable by modern historical thinking even though it is straing us in the face because we look for pots and jewellery because that is what is important to US : functonality and design, and precious mineral resources. Only a society which does not understand fur and prestige elitism display can not see the obvious: that cold places have the best furs. And THAT is the reason for the migration there and a wealthy advanced peoples; a people who VALUED animals for incentive: particularly fox; and significantly clearly didn't overhunt them: http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/europe/article1292192.ece So then I got a bit of flak in the chat room for suggesting that man SURVIVED the bottleneck because he could sew fur into complex garments...something no human had ever been able to do. Okay there is a 24 000 year gap. However, when so many homanid culture remained unchanged for 2 million of years, since the discovery of fire and the first skinning of animals for fur, I knew there had to be a link. I have found it. Now man wasn't supposed to have developed complex language to convey symbolism abstratc ideas etc until 40 000 years ago and here we are. A culture that has. Now I needed to find one that could do that as close to the bottleneck as possible. I found it. There were a group of humans 70 000 years ago worshipping (a sign of symbolic thought and language...passing on religion is impossible to people who just grunt) PYTHONS: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/12/061222-python-ritual.html Now whether the snake is human carved or not is irrelevant...there is other evidence of ritual behaviour there; the first known in 2 million years of humans. And so there it is folks. The first evidence that man 70 000 years ago made a dramatic transition and a small few survived the bottleneck By being able to share ideas through complex language, therefore have the ability to : 1. give abstract meaning to animals...therefore deveop reigion which valued them and therefore make the wearing of them SYMBOLIC. In practical terms, a smilodon fur would certainly signify a great hunter, or bestow the value on another through trade etc. 2.Development of human symbolic power/wealth as a result 3. Enable conceptual design of clothing, and tools needed to fashion them: hence leggings, footwear etc. in furs So that is as close as I can come to suggesting a theory that all mankind owes their existence to fur design , animal worship that enabled not only he to survive; but our old mates the fox and caribou with him. All humans and homanids that could NOT do the above three things vanished without trace, victims of the lake Tolba eruptions and blackened skies which sent the planet into freezing darkness. The first true culture was one based on fur and hide clothing, and respect for the animals and wearing of them to denote prestige. So enough of being ashamed of all that yes? Now if we can all get BACK to worshipping animals, caring for them and valuing thhem and the produce they give us above ALL else, then perhaps we have a future. Footnote: non of this is anti religious; on the contrary. As Linda often says she believs the animal a gift from God in a Judaeo Christian sense. Same idea; different perspective. I dare say if the cheetah suddenly developed culture he would worship the antelope, and then maybe work out who created the antelope for him. The imporant thing is that the antelope IS the source of the cheetah's being. And likewise, furbearers should be to us. And THAT is why I think we all here have some kind of primal connection to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now